Re: [GENERAL] Re: With what options RPM was compiled? ( Was: CzechWin1250 sorting q)

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Robert <robert(at)robert(dot)cz>, pgsql-general(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: With what options RPM was compiled? ( Was: CzechWin1250 sorting q)
Date: 1999-12-14 18:06:26
Message-ID: 38568722.3C50BACA@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
> On 1999-12-13, Lamar Owen mentioned:
>
> > The default 6.5.3-2 RPM's are compiled with --enable-locale, but not
> > with --with-mb=LATIN2.
>
> Perhaps the next set of RPMs could be compiled with --enable-locale and
> --with-mb=SQL_ASCII. At least do it like now: the non-locale/non-multibyte
> version for performance, and the locale/mb version for features. Please
> note that SQL_ASCII doesn't mean that the db cannot support any other
> encoding, it's just the default encoding initdb uses.

With version 6.5.3, setting --with-mb=SQL_ASCII throws a configure
error. It then lists the valid encodings, which do not include
SQL_ASCII.

--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message admin 1999-12-14 18:09:14 indices don't make much difference
Previous Message Steven Saner 1999-12-14 17:58:09 Re: [GENERAL] pg_psort files