Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql

From: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>
To: Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql
Date: 1999-12-11 03:13:47
Message-ID: 3851C16B.ABD356AD@alumni.caltech.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Don't know if anyone would feel comfortable with it, but at
> least, the postmaster log must be checked to show up exactly
> the same too. The only alternative would be to check every
> old/expected to new/results manually (what's really a whole
> lot of damned stupid work).

I've done a whole lot of dsw before, and will get to it sometime
unless someone does it first...

- Thomas

--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 1999-12-11 03:17:36 psql & regression (was: Error in new psql)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 1999-12-11 02:45:24 Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql