Re: InitPostgres and flatfiles question

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: InitPostgres and flatfiles question
Date: 2007-01-06 03:40:28
Message-ID: 3845.24.211.165.134.1168054828.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>>>> What value is allowing multiple queies via PQexec()
>>>
>>> The only argument I can think of is that it allows applications to be
>>> sloppy about parsing a SQL script into individual commands before they
>>> send it. (I think initdb may be guilty of exactly that BTW...) At the
>>> same time you could argue that such sloppiness is inherently a Bad
>>> Idea.

initdb doesn't use libpq at all ... are you saying it should only pass
individual statements to the backend? Adding smarts to enable that would
add complexity without any benefit I can see.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-06 03:57:32 Re: [HACKERS] wal_checksum = on (default) | off
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-01-06 03:21:25 Re: A patch to pg_regress for Windows port