Re: Temporary tables under hot standby

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Temporary tables under hot standby
Date: 2012-04-26 14:12:01
Message-ID: 3845.1335449521@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 3:56 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Previous discussions had Tom proposing ways of extending catalogs to
>> allow exactly this. So designs that address that point are already on
>> record.

> Link?

There was a thread a couple years ago ...
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-10/msg01203.php
particularly here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-10/msg01448.php

But I have a feeling that that idea is much older.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-04-26 14:12:02 Re: Temporary tables under hot standby
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2012-04-26 14:10:09 Re: Future In-Core Replication