Re: [INTERFACES] PgAccess 0.98 and libpq.so.2

From: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
To: Nigel Berkeley <nige(at)incagold(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] PgAccess 0.98 and libpq.so.2
Date: 1999-11-24 18:31:22
Message-ID: 383C2EFA.52F08591@wgcr.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Nigel Berkeley wrote:
> [which pgaccess] comes up with: /usr/local/pgsql/bin/pgaccess
>
> which is correct as far as I know

If that's where you installed 6.5.3, then that's correct.

> Nope, nothing there and dont you mean libpgtcl.so? :)

Yes, I do mean libpgtcl.so -- intstead of getting tongue-tied, I get
finger-tied.

> > In building the RPM's for 6.5.3 on RedHats 5.2 and 6.1, I did not run
> > across this problem.
>
> I didnt build it from an RPM, I built it with the make file from the
> source.

When building the RPM's for distribution, I make from sources -- and
have not run into this problem on RedHat 5.2 or 6.1. The RPM building
process (which I have done a number of times in maintaining the RPM
distribution) does a complete configure/make/make install cycle (amongst
other things) during a build.

libpq.so.1 went out before version 6.4. -- so I'd look for a libpgtcl.so
(or pgtksh or pgtclsh) from pre-6.4 (6.3.2 shipped with RedHat 5.1).

Did pgaccess work at 6.5.1?

--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nigel Berkeley 1999-11-25 00:58:42 Re: [INTERFACES] PgAccess 0.98 and libpq.so.2
Previous Message Nigel Berkeley 1999-11-24 17:28:39 Re: [INTERFACES] PgAccess 0.98 and libpq.so.2