Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: OpenSSL 3.0.0 compatibility
Date: 2020-06-01 14:00:05
Message-ID: 382323.1591020005@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On 6/1/20 8:03 AM, Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>> +1 for adding it to the Makefile.

> OK, here's a patch.

Likewise +1 for having it in the makefile. But now you have two copies,
the other being in comments in the test script. The latter should go
away, as we surely won't remember to maintain it. (You could replace it
with a pointer to the makefile rules if you want.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Bachir 2020-06-01 14:49:25 Re: feature idea: use index when checking for NULLs before SET NOT NULL
Previous Message Amit Khandekar 2020-06-01 13:59:39 Re: Inlining of couple of functions in pl_exec.c improves performance