Re: Not quite a security hole in internal_in

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Sergey Burladyan <eshkinkot(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Not quite a security hole in internal_in
Date: 2009-06-10 01:30:05
Message-ID: 3819.1244597405@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Sergey Burladyan <eshkinkot(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> How about contrib/ ? I have this in my test 8.3.7 database:

That stuff should all be marked strict ... on the whole I'm not sure
that contrib is null-safe anyway, independently of this particular
issue. AFAIK no one's really gone through it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ron Mayer 2009-06-10 02:49:31 Re: INTERVAL SECOND limited to 59 seconds?
Previous Message Sergey Burladyan 2009-06-10 00:39:18 Re: Not quite a security hole in internal_in