Re: Crash in new pgstats code

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <fujii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Crash in new pgstats code
Date: 2022-05-12 16:12:59
Message-ID: 381855.1652371979@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2022-05-11 15:46:13 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Do we have anything remaining on this thread in light of the upcoming
>> beta1? One fix has been pushed upthread, but it does not seem we are
>> completely in the clear either.

> I don't know what else there is to do, tbh.

Well, it was mostly you expressing misgivings upthread ;-). But we
have not seen any pgstat crashes lately, so I'm content to mark the
open item as resolved.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2022-05-12 16:33:05 Re: Crash in new pgstats code
Previous Message Tom Lane 2022-05-12 15:59:49 Re: Mark all GUC variable as PGDLLIMPORT