Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Mike Mascari <mascarim(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> >> Does this field exist for all previous postgres releases (specifically,
> >> 6.2,6.3, and 6.4) ??
>
> > And of course, it appears also in 6.4.x, so I assume that it was added
> > between the 6.2 and 6.3 releases. Is that going to be a problem?
>
> For Peter's purposes, it's unnecessary to worry about anything older
> than 6.4, since he's depending on an up-to-date libpq and current libpq
> won't talk to anything older than 6.4.
>
> Byron might still care about 6.2 ... I dunno whether ODBC currently
> really works with 6.2 or not, or whether it needs to keep doing so.
>
> regards, tom lane

It still really works with 6.2! But whether it needs to, is another
question!

I'm not sure if anyone cares if it works with 6.2 (even 6.3 for that
matter) or not.

Byron