Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Bill Moran" <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files
Date: 2007-01-04 01:05:27
Message-ID: 3813.24.211.165.134.1167872727.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bill Moran wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>> Bill Moran wrote:
>> > + if (trace_temp_files != -1)
>> >
>>
>> Might be more robust to say
>>
>> if (trace_temp_files >= 0)
>
> Because it would allow for the easy addition of more negative numbers
> with magic value?
>

because ISTM any negative number here should mean no action is to be
taken. Otherwise how else is it different from 0?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jaime Casanova 2007-01-04 01:42:20 Re: TODO: Add a GUC to control whether BEGIN inside
Previous Message Bill Moran 2007-01-04 00:56:10 Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2007-01-04 01:46:57 Re: xlog directory at initdb time
Previous Message Bill Moran 2007-01-04 00:56:10 Re: [HACKERS] Patch to log usage of temporary files