Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>
Cc: Vince Vielhaber <vev(at)michvhf(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>, "'Bruce Momjian'" <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?
Date: 1999-10-22 04:59:54
Message-ID: 380FEF4A.437C1D18@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Lamar Owen wrote:
>
> Vince Vielhaber wrote:
> > Items in the contrib section aren't required for the use of PostgreSQL,
> > however PostgreSQL *is* required to use those items. So shouldn't the
> > items in contrib have to change to a Berkeley style license? :)
> >
> > I mean it's only fair!
>
> I know of at least two items in contrib that are required to run the
> regression tests -- which, arguably, make PostgreSQL require those two
> components (autoinc and refint).

Well, I made them... so you know what copyright is... -:)

Vadim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 1999-10-22 05:22:22 Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits
Previous Message Vadim Mikheev 1999-10-22 04:54:28 Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits