| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Manipulating complex types as non-contiguous structures in-memory |
| Date: | 2015-05-01 18:39:12 |
| Message-ID: | 38026.1430505552@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2015-05-01 11:11:14 -0700, Tom Lane wrote:
>> What are you trying to apply it to? I see array_append() in
>> src/backend/utils/adt/array_userfuncs.c in HEAD. Also, are
>> you checking the 1.1 version of the patch?
> That's very likely due to the transforms patch, with added another
> column to pg_proc...
No, my patch doesn't touch pg_proc.h. I'm certainly prepared to believe
it's suffered bit rot in the last couple of weeks, but I don't understand
how it would apply successfully and then generate a complaint about
array_append not being there. array_append *is* there in HEAD, and has
been for awhile.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-05-01 18:51:21 | Re: Implementing SQL ASSERTION |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-01 18:30:51 | Re: cost_index() and path row estimate. |