Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management

From: Brendan Jurd <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management
Date: 2009-12-02 21:18:35
Message-ID: 37ed240d0912021318x10b58bdbl95afd4b2ac67180d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2009/12/3 Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm.  So the argument for it is "let's make a machine-readable format
>> more human-readable"?  I'm not getting the point.  People should look
>> at the regular text output.
>
> IMHO YAML beats the regular text format for human-readability -
> at least for people with narrow terminal windows, and for novices.

Agreed. Calling the regular text output of EXPLAIN "human readable"
is an exaggeration.

Cheers,
BJ

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-12-02 21:24:13 Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-12-02 20:48:01 Re: Page-level version upgrade (was: Block-level CRC checks)