| From: | "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Split up the wiki TODO page? |
| Date: | 2008-08-26 19:01:26 |
| Message-ID: | 37ed240d0808261201n3e01a262kb41f8cffaefa4c1a@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 4:23 AM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> Goodness, if only we had some kind of organized repository for these TODO
> items capable of holding multiple categories per item. Maybe something with
> items and attributes, and some kind of "relationship" between the TODO item
> and its categories.
>
> I don't know where we'd find something like that, though. Maybe we should
> see if the folks at Ingres have anything. ;-/
>
I think I may have heard of such a beast. I believe they call it an
"infostation", or something.
Anyway ...
I've written up a quick explanation of how to administer the todo list:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Talk:Todo
I just planted it on the Talk page for the Todo, rather than creating
a separate page for it.
Cheers,
BJ
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-08-26 19:54:12 | Re: Restartable signals 'n all that |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-08-26 18:57:04 | Is it really such a good thing for newNode() to be a macro? |