From: | "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Neil Conway" <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> |
Cc: | "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Indicate disabled triggers in \d |
Date: | 2006-11-11 02:38:13 |
Message-ID: | 37ed240d0611101838j747aa3bdh46042ec0fc58d45@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
On 11/11/06, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The patch still leaks result7 circa line 1400 (CVS HEAD). I didn't look
> closely, but you probably also leak result7 circa line 1209, if result6
> is NULL.
New version of the patch attached (against CVS HEAD) that fixes these
two issues.
> (Yeah, we definitely need to refactor describeOneTableDetails().)
I'd be interested in doing some work on this. What did you have in mind?
BJ
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
describe_disabled_trigs.diff | application/octet-stream | 4.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim C. Nasby | 2006-11-11 05:31:07 | Failure on tapir / only 10 max connections? |
Previous Message | mark | 2006-11-11 01:54:38 | Re: PostgreSQL 8.2 (from CVS devel) first impressions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-12 04:28:50 | Re: [PATCHES] BUG #2704: pg_class.relchecks overflow problem |
Previous Message | Neil Conway | 2006-11-11 00:16:53 | Re: [HACKERS] Indicate disabled triggers in \d |