| From: | Wolfgang Hottgenroth <wn(at)kja-essen(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | woho(at)ieee(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-interfaces(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] problems with large-objects |
| Date: | 1999-10-02 16:13:45 |
| Message-ID: | 37F62F39.CF77422E@kja-essen.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Hi again,
Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > So I failed when reading the manual,
> > because I never realized, that using transactions are a requirement when
> > working with LO's.
> > > This restriction has been documented as required all along,
>
> Well, just because we think we've documented it doesn't mean that it
> is obvious. Now that you know, do the docs you were reading make this
> clear and you just missed it, or should it be mentioned in more places
> than it is currently? Let us know if you have suggestions for
> improvements...
Of course I take an immediate look into the docs, and I found it: In the
sample program of the Large-Object-chapter (Chapter 15). Is this the
only place where it is documented? If this is the only place, then I
think, it should be mentioned in more places. Or can you tell me, where
I can read more about it?
Wolfgang
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-10-02 17:11:02 | Re: [INTERFACES] problems with large-objects |
| Previous Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-10-02 16:08:03 | Re: [INTERFACES] problems with large-objects |