Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests on intel for 6.5.2

From: Christof Petig <christof(dot)petig(at)wtal(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests on intel for 6.5.2
Date: 1999-10-01 05:36:26
Message-ID: 37F44859.FD1B3D52@wtal.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> Yes, we should not be assuming that finite() is a macro, which is what
> that #ifdef coding does. We need a HAVE_FINITE configuration test.
> If you have time to prepare the diffs it'd be great.

Here they are
Christof

Attachment Content-Type Size
diff text/plain 1.9 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christof Petig 1999-10-01 06:24:22 are subtransactions not nestable?
Previous Message Thomas Lockhart 1999-10-01 02:57:06 Re: TO_CHAR()