Re: [HACKERS] COPY

From: Theo Kramer <theo(at)flame(dot)co(dot)za>
To: hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] COPY
Date: 1999-08-13 15:28:30
Message-ID: 37B4399E.5C62183B@flame.co.za
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> I can think of situations where you'd want it either way. (For example,
> in a pg_dump restore script I'd sure want big red warning flags if there
> were any problems, not a piddly little message in the postmaster log...)
>
> How about creating a SET variable that chooses either the above behavior
> or the existing one?
>
> If that seems acceptable all 'round, we can start arguing about which
> way ought to be the default ;-)

Sounds good to me. I'll start looking at whats involved.
--------
Regards
Theo

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Theo Kramer 1999-08-13 15:29:21 Re: [HACKERS] Index scan?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 1999-08-13 15:21:21 Re: We won!