Re: [INTERFACES] Proper use of Transactions...

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Herouth Maoz <herouth(at)oumail(dot)openu(dot)ac(dot)il>, Matthew Hagerty <matthew(at)venux(dot)net>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Proper use of Transactions...
Date: 1999-08-10 00:50:20
Message-ID: 37AF774C.F2F43D1C@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Tom Lane wrote:
>
> Even if the backend itself crashes, an uncommitted transaction will
> remain uncommitted, since no entry saying it's committed ever gets
> written to pg_log. Any tuples the dead backend did manage to write out
> will look like not-yet-committed tuples until the end of time.
>
> BTW, I am not sure whether VACUUM ever realizes it can reclaim those
> uncommitted tuples. To do that it'd have to make some kind of

It does.

Vadim

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Margarita Barvinok 1999-08-10 17:12:21 Web, PostgreSQL, C
Previous Message Tom Lane 1999-08-09 14:05:20 Re: [INTERFACES] Proper use of Transactions...