> IIRC, you were the main advocate of the position that the code's
> existing behavior is correct. Does that mean I can go change it? ;-)
Yes, after you slap me around a bit for being so wrong. Do you
remember when we were discussing it? I want to go back and see why I
thought this was right. I'm guessing that the example was not phrased
in exactly this way, and that there may be some other behavior we need
to maintain. (Otherwise, I might have used up my "one wrong idea per
year" ;)
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California