Re: optimizing Postgres queries

From: David Teran <david(dot)teran(at)cluster9(dot)com>
To: Shridhar Daithankar <shridhar_daithankar(at)myrealbox(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: optimizing Postgres queries
Date: 2004-01-05 12:18:06
Message-ID: 3796212E-3F79-11D8-A528-000A95A6F0DC@cluster9.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Hi,

> The performance will likely to be the same. Its just that integer
> happens to
> be default integer type and hence it does not need an explicit
> typecast. ( I
> don't remember exactly which integer is default but it is either of
> int2,int4
> and int8...:-))
>
The docs say int4 is much faster than int8, but i will check this.

> The performance diffference is likely due to use of index, which is in
> turn
> due to typecasting. If you need bigint, you should use them. Just
> remember to
> typecast whenever required.

This is my bigger problem: i am using EOF (OR mapping tool) which frees
me more or less form writing a lot of SQL. If i need to typecast to use
an index then i have to see how to do this with this framework.

Regards David

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shridhar Daithankar 2004-01-05 12:37:53 Re: optimizing Postgres queries
Previous Message Shridhar Daithankar 2004-01-05 12:10:05 Re: optimizing Postgres queries