| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, gazzatav(at)gmail(dot)com, Pg Docs <pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: initdb - creating clusters |
| Date: | 2020-08-30 15:21:36 |
| Message-ID: | 3793995.1598800896@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> + The discussions in this chapter assume that you are working with
> + an unmodified version of <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>,
> + for example one that you built from source according to the directions
> + in the preceding chapters. If you are working with a pre-packaged
> Rather than "unmodified", would it be better to say something more
> like "without any extra supporting infrastructure"?
So maybe "... you are working with plain
<productname>PostgreSQL</productname> without any additional
infrastructure, for example a copy that you built from source
according to the directions in the preceding chapters." ?
Do you have a feeling one way or the other about whether to repeat
some of this text in each of the relevant sub-sections? I initially
didn't want to do that, but thinking about how people consume the
HTML docs, I'm afraid that anything not appearing on the same page
won't get seen.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Erwin Brandstetter | 2020-08-30 21:39:59 | Re: Update limitations for declarative partitioning |
| Previous Message | Thomas Munro | 2020-08-29 22:05:50 | Re: initdb - creating clusters |