Re: Rare link canary failure in dblink test

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Rare link canary failure in dblink test
Date: 2020-08-30 14:48:42
Message-ID: 3792338.1598798922@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> A couple of recent cases where an error "libpq is incorrectly linked
> to backend functions" broke the dblink test:

lorikeet seems just plain unstable these days :-(. Don't know why.

> ... curiously the message also appeared a
> couple of times on two Unixen. Perhaps we can write those off as lost
> in the mists of time.

No, those were expected, because they ran between ed0cdf0e0, which
intentionally introduced this error, and e3d77ea6b and 4fa3741d1
which fixed it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2020-08-30 15:03:15 Re: Disk-based hash aggregate's cost model
Previous Message David CARLIER 2020-08-30 13:03:32 [PATCH v1] explicit_bzero.c: using explicit_memset on NetBSD