Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Native XML

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Anton <antonin(dot)houska(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Native XML
Date: 2011-02-27 15:45:55
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Anton <antonin(dot)houska(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I've been playing with 'native XML' for a while and now wondering if
> further development of such a feature makes sense for Postgres.
> ...
> Unlike 'libxml2', the parser uses palloc()/pfree(). The output format is
> independent from any 3rd party code.

Hmm, so this doesn't rely on libxml2 at all?  Given the amount of pain
that library has caused us, getting out from under it seems like a
mighty attractive idea.  How big a chunk of code do you think it'd be
by the time you complete the missing features?

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Marko TiikkajaDate: 2011-02-27 17:14:41
Subject: Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature
Previous:From: Yeb HavingaDate: 2011-02-27 14:39:05
Subject: Re: pg_basebackup and wal streaming

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group