Re: Native XML

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Anton <antonin(dot)houska(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Native XML
Date: 2011-02-27 15:45:55
Message-ID: 3787.1298821555@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Anton <antonin(dot)houska(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I've been playing with 'native XML' for a while and now wondering if
> further development of such a feature makes sense for Postgres.
> ...
> Unlike 'libxml2', the parser uses palloc()/pfree(). The output format is
> independent from any 3rd party code.

Hmm, so this doesn't rely on libxml2 at all? Given the amount of pain
that library has caused us, getting out from under it seems like a
mighty attractive idea. How big a chunk of code do you think it'd be
by the time you complete the missing features?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marko Tiikkaja 2011-02-27 17:14:41 Re: wCTE: about the name of the feature
Previous Message Yeb Havinga 2011-02-27 14:39:05 Re: pg_basebackup and wal streaming