Re: [HACKERS] Fwd: Joins and links

From: Vadim Mikheev <vadim(at)krs(dot)ru>
To: Leon <leon(at)udmnet(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fwd: Joins and links
Date: 1999-07-06 12:05:22
Message-ID: 3781F102.2AB6F6F8@krs.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Leon wrote:
>
> So. The main drawback is higher priority for VACUUM. Not
> too large, eh?
>
> When you will decide - to implement or not to implement,

We will not decide -:))
If someone want to implement it - welcome.

> I urge you to think again about the relief on optimizer,
> which I stressed many times. No one rebutted yet that adding
> brains to optimizer so that it can use appropriate join method
> will require major rewrite. With links you get the best join
> method as side effect - virtually for free. These joins
> will never be too slow for an unknown reason. Think carefully.
> I hope you will make wise decision.

Optimizer requires major rewrite in any case, even
having links implemented.

Vadim

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Leon 1999-07-06 12:13:58 Re: [HACKERS] Fwd: Joins and links
Previous Message Leon 1999-07-06 11:36:57 Re[2]: [HACKERS] Fwd: Joins and links