Re: Perl library (was Building Postgres)

From: Edmund Mergl <E(dot)Mergl(at)bawue(dot)de>
To: Cristian Gafton <gafton(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu>, Postgres Hackers List <hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Perl library (was Building Postgres)
Date: 1999-06-30 04:56:20
Message-ID: 3779A374.507F416D@bawue.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Cristian Gafton wrote:
>
> On Mon, 28 Jun 1999, Thomas Lockhart wrote:
>
> > machine? Can I instead just plop some files into the proper place on
> > the target machine in a version-independent way?
>
> On a Red Hat system you can use /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl, for example.
> That is not dependent on perl version.
>
> Cristian
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Cristian Gafton -- gafton(at)redhat(dot)com -- Red Hat, Inc.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> UNIX is user friendly. It's just selective about who its friends are.

if you install a perl module in the standard way (make install)
on a RedHat system, you will end up with the modules installed in:

/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/i386-linux/

A standard Makfile.PL does not contain any information about
the target directories. This is always handled by perl itself.

Edmund

--
Edmund Mergl
mailto:E(dot)Mergl(at)bawue(dot)de
http://www.bawue.de/~mergl

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Richards 1999-06-30 04:57:55 Getting number of tuples affected
Previous Message Michael Richards 1999-06-30 04:55:24 Re: [HACKERS] Hot Backup Ability