Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC and character sets

From: David Warnock <david(at)sundayta(dot)co(dot)uk>
To: Peter Mount <petermount(at)it(dot)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
Cc: "'Herouth Maoz'" <herouth(at)oumail(dot)openu(dot)ac(dot)il>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] JDBC and character sets
Date: 1999-06-22 16:45:34
Message-ID: 376FBDAE.B898CA4E@sundayta.co.uk
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-interfaces

Peter,

Obviously I agree 100% that supporting unicode should not break existing
applications or code.

How about either a extra parameter to the creation of a connection?

If it is easier to keep this very separate I don't mind a completely
separate jar file/driver at least to start with. After all most people
won't yet be using this feature so why bloat their driver?

Dave
--
David Warnock
Sundayta Ltd

In response to

Browse pgsql-interfaces by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message robert_hiltibidal_at_cms08405 1999-06-22 18:16:47 No subject given
Previous Message Peter Mount 1999-06-22 16:27:54 RE: [INTERFACES] JDBC:Using Large Objects