| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Hoffmann <jeff(at)remapcorp(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? |
| Date: | 1999-06-19 02:11:58 |
| Message-ID: | 376AFC6E.EF9B47F7@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> has something changed with r-tree indexes in 6.5?
> any ideas?
revision 1.29
date: 1999/05/31 19:32:47; author: tgl; state: Exp; lines: +61 -5
Generate a more specific error message when an operator used
in an index doesn't have a restriction selectivity estimator.
Tom, was there anything more here than the new elog error exit itself?
It used to ignore the missing estimator, or fail farther in to the
code?
> ps, is it just me, or do things seem a little dead around here today?
At your office, or on the list? Most of us were waiting for your
message ;)
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas Lockhart | 1999-06-19 02:20:18 | Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-06-19 01:04:16 | Re: [HACKERS] has anybody else used r-tree indexes in 6.5? |