Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?
Date: 2020-07-24 14:06:53
Message-ID: 376741.1595599613@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Well, I think the comments could be more clear - for the insert case
> specifically - about which cases you think are and are not safe.

Yeah, the proposed comment changes don't actually add much. Also
please try to avoid inserting non-ASCII &nbsp; into the source code;
at least in my mail reader, that attachment has some.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2020-07-24 14:17:36 Re: Making CASE error handling less surprising
Previous Message Robert Haas 2020-07-24 13:53:50 Re: INSERT INTO SELECT, Why Parallelism is not selected?