| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Brent Verner <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, Vsevolod Lobko <seva(at)sevasoft(dot)kiev(dot)ua>, Murray Prior Hobbs <murray(at)efone(dot)com>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) |
| Date: | 2002-01-23 18:05:27 |
| Message-ID: | 3759.1011809127@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
>> [ scratches head ... ] Where is the expansion happening, then? Seems
>> weird.
> The $@ is expanded as a make variable. Make does care whether you're
> executing a $(shell) thing around it. However, it seems that $@ should
> expand to nothing in that assignment, so where's the problem?
I think the complaint is that we need it to still look like $@ when
TCL_SHLIB_LD is used in the shlib-building rule. If Make recursively
expands the variable before executing the $shell construct then we
got trouble.
Ugly as it is, the check on portname may be the best solution available.
I'm gonna think a little more, but I haven't got a better idea now.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-23 18:07:51 | Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) |
| Previous Message | Bernhard Herzog | 2002-01-23 18:02:14 | Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-01-23 18:07:51 | Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) |
| Previous Message | Bernhard Herzog | 2002-01-23 18:02:14 | Re: pltcl build problem on FreeBSD (was: Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems) |