| From: | "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Testing with concurrent sessions |
| Date: | 2010-01-07 17:34:52 |
| Message-ID: | 3750176155b8e0af30821a3a7194fd88@biglumber.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160
> Unless we are prepared to define concurrency testing as something
> separate from the basic regression tests. Which is kind of annoying but
> perhaps less so than the alternatives. It certainly seems to me to
> be the kind of thing you wouldn't need to test in order to have
> confidence in a local build.
I thought we were leaning towards something separate.
- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001071234
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iEYEAREDAAYFAktGGxYACgkQvJuQZxSWSsgG0gCfZ4eTpXd/97p3zSJpLqGhKMh6
8nMAoJ2lQUaCWNVeSPDU8fq7VnkO0s4C
=xBOo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2010-01-07 17:39:55 | Re: Testing with concurrent sessions |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-01-07 17:32:25 | Re: Hot Standy introduced problem with query cancel behavior |