Re: Logical replication subscription owner

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net, chris+postgresql(at)qwirx(dot)com, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Subject: Re: Logical replication subscription owner
Date: 2020-05-09 15:17:26
Message-ID: 3747.1589037446@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> writes:
> Not to make the life of everybody more complicated here, but I don't
> agree. LOGIN and REPLICATION are in my opinion completely orthogonal
> and it sounds more natural IMO that a REPLICATION user should be able
> to log into the server only if it has LOGIN defined.

ISTM those statements are contradictory. The two privileges could
only be called orthogonal if it's possible to make use of one without
having the other. As things stand, REPLICATION without LOGIN is an
entirely useless setting.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-05-09 15:34:24 Re: Another modest proposal for docs formatting: catalog descriptions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2020-05-09 08:57:01 Re: Logical replication subscription owner

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-05-09 15:34:24 Re: Another modest proposal for docs formatting: catalog descriptions
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2020-05-09 14:40:15 Re: +(pg_lsn, int8) and -(pg_lsn, int8) operators