| From: | Thomas Lockhart <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp>, hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] inet data type regression test fails |
| Date: | 1999-05-09 15:24:13 |
| Message-ID: | 3735A89D.E152DF61@alumni.caltech.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Can someone comment on this one? Is it fixed?
> > The inet regression test has been failed on my LinuxPPC.
> > My guess is shifting over 32bit against a 32bit integer is
> > not permitted and the result is platform depedent.
Yes, it is fixed. You applied the patches :)
backend/utils/adt/network.c:
revision 1.6
date: 1999/02/24 03:17:05; author: momjian; state: Exp; lines: +7
-2
Thank you for the advice. I concluded that current inet code has a
portability problem. Included patches should be applied to both
current and 6.4 tree. I have tested on LinuxPPC, FreeBSD and Solaris
2.6. Now the inet regression tests on these platforms are all happy.
- Thomas
--
Thomas Lockhart lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu
South Pasadena, California
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 1999-05-09 15:33:06 | Re: [GENERAL] inet and cidr type problems |
| Previous Message | Dmitry Samersoff | 1999-05-09 15:23:53 | Problem installing plpgsql |