| From: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)trust(dot)ee> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Garner <peter_garner(at)yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)hub(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [INTERFACES] Some needed features in postgresql |
| Date: | 1999-05-03 06:35:34 |
| Message-ID: | 372D43B6.B522067B@trust.ee |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
Michael Meskes wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 30, 1999 at 04:37:24PM -0700, Peter Garner wrote:
> > 2. Is there any work being done on the fact that
> > transactions are aborted when an error occurs? It
> > really lessens the usefulness of the product when,
> > after adding 20,000 records, the transaction aborts
> > because the 20,001th record is a dup key! :-)
>
> But this is exactly what a transaction is supposed to do. You should only
> make those commands inside one transaction that logically belong to each
> other or in other words, that you consider one action.
But _nested_ transactions would still be nice .
---------
Hannu
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Garner | 1999-05-03 08:26:07 | Re: [INTERFACES] Some needed features in postgresql |
| Previous Message | Roberto Taglioretti | 1999-05-03 05:00:05 | C program Postgres 6.3 and date |