| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Parallel worker error |
| Date: | 2017-08-30 21:33:56 |
| Message-ID: | 3728.1504128836@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> In this case,
>> I'll blame the fact that we allow a role to be dropped while there are
>> users connected using that role.
> Actually, my first comment when Pavan mentioned this on IM was that we
> should look into fixing that problem sometime. It's not terribly urgent
> since it doesn't seem to hurt anything too badly, but it's still a bug.
My feeling is that it's going to be unreasonably expensive. Are we
going to take a lock every time we call a SECURITY DEFINER function?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-08-30 22:01:23 | Re: The case for removing replacement selection sort |
| Previous Message | Regina Obe | 2017-08-30 21:33:37 | pg_upgrade changes can it use CREATE EXTENSION? |