| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Thomas G(dot) Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux |
| Date: | 1998-12-13 21:45:54 |
| Message-ID: | 3727.913585554@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Thomas G. Lockhart" <lockhart(at)alumni(dot)caltech(dot)edu> writes:
> ... So, should I make that change in both trees, or just in the
> development tree? My recommendation is to be *really* conservative and
> not change it around for v6.4.1, since there may be a supported platform
> which doesn't conform to our assumptions.
Well, we have a bug report against 6.4, so my inclination is to change
it in both trees. We know that the current code is broken on at least
one major platform. I think that outweighs the unproven possibility
that the other way might be broken somewhere...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-12-13 22:03:18 | Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux |
| Previous Message | Thomas G. Lockhart | 1998-12-13 21:06:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Date/time on glibc2 linux |