| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jacob Champion <jacob(dot)champion(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: disabled SSL log_like tests |
| Date: | 2025-05-09 14:03:51 |
| Message-ID: | 372414.1746799431@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> writes:
> On 9 May 2025, at 02:15, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Right. I think the attached would be amenable to that.
> It will be a bit awkward to ask "are you libressl" if we ever add support for
> something not OpenSSL based, but we could always revisit should that happen.
I was imagining that unrelated backends would simply make the method
report constant-false. But in any case, redesigning this in the light
of any future requirements doesn't seem like a big deal. What I'm
mainly after for today is just to ensure that these various which-
library-is-it tests are visibly interconnected, so that we don't
forget to check them all when things change.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2025-05-09 14:15:03 | Re: Adding skip scan (including MDAM style range skip scan) to nbtree |
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2025-05-09 13:59:59 | Re: strange perf regression with data checksums |