Re: Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Ivanov <d(dot)ivanov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance
Date: 2016-12-16 20:40:29
Message-ID: 371b371a-db6d-0c1a-47e1-a02a206671dd@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/16/16 11:05 AM, Robert Haas wrote:

> If we were going to do anything about this,
> my vote would be to remove sql_inheritance.

+1. This option is long past the intended shelf life.

--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-12-16 20:40:55 Re: pg_authid.rolpassword format (was Re: Password identifiers, protocol aging and SCRAM protocol)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2016-12-16 20:33:02 Re: Declarative partitioning vs. sql_inheritance