Re: ERROR: expected just one rule action

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: "Dave Livesay" <dlivesay(at)covad(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: ERROR: expected just one rule action
Date: 2008-02-11 17:29:14
Message-ID: 3713.1202750954@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> On Feb 11, 2008 4:28 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> "Dave Page" <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
>>> If the endianess isn't corrected for the non-native platform at build
>>> time, I've seen initdb leave a cluster with a completely broken
>>> pg_rewrite (iirc).
>>
>> Hmm, but is pg_rewrite really the most obvious symptom? In 8.3 I would
>> expect massive breakage all over, because of the varvarlena stuff's
>> sensitivity to endianness.

> It was what we found first upon investigating why my first attempts at
> building a universal binary failed.

Okay, then that definitely suggests that this is a theory for Dave L.
to pursue. In a universal build you need to do ./configure twice to
generate two different pg_config.h files. I imagine his "helpful
fellow" knew that already, if he'd been able to generate universal
binaries with Xcode 2.5, but maybe 3.0 is messing it up somehow.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message salman 2008-02-11 17:40:45 Question about CLUSTER
Previous Message Jeff 2008-02-11 17:08:14 Re: Working with huge amount of data.