| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, John Naylor <johncnaylorls(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Fix missing FORMAT when deparsing JSON_ARRAY(query) |
| Date: | 2026-07-27 02:14:00 |
| Message-ID: | 3712538.1785118440@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> v2 LGTM.
Thanks for looking!
> I'm not sure whether we should mention Claude in the commit
> message, or if either way is fine.
Yeah, I'm not sure either. We discussed the point at last week's
AI workshop, but no decision was reached, and even if we'd had
consensus an off-list discussion isn't sufficient to set a project
policy. So for the moment I'm going to err in the conservative
direction by mentioning LLM use in an informal way. I imagine
that we'll end up either deciding that it needn't be mentioned
or adding a new standardized commit-message tag. But I don't
know which way we'll jump.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2026-07-27 02:17:21 | Snapshot export on a standby corrupts hint bits on subxact overflow |
| Previous Message | Chao Li | 2026-07-27 01:49:00 | Re: Fix RETURNING side effects for FOR PORTION OF leftover rows |