Re: Improving EXPLAIN's display of SubPlan nodes

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Chantal Keller <chantal(dot)keller(at)universite-paris-saclay(dot)fr>
Subject: Re: Improving EXPLAIN's display of SubPlan nodes
Date: 2024-03-18 23:19:03
Message-ID: 3712528.1710803943@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Hm. I used "rescan(SubPlan)" in the attached, but it still looks
> a bit odd to my eye.

After thinking a bit more, I understood what was bothering me about
that notation: it looks too much like a call of a user-defined
function named "rescan()". I think we'd be better off with the
all-caps "RESCAN()".

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2024-03-18 23:30:50 Re: Popcount optimization using AVX512
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-03-18 22:54:46 Re: Built-in CTYPE provider