RE: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem

From: "Mikheev, Vadim" <vmikheev(at)SECTORBASE(dot)COM>
To: "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "'Bruce Momjian'" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: RE: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem
Date: 2001-05-21 16:55:40
Message-ID: 3705826352029646A3E91C53F7189E32016632@sectorbase2.sectorbase.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> I hope we can avoid on-disk FSM. Seems to me that that would create
> problems both for performance (lots of extra disk I/O) and reliability
> (what happens if FSM is corrupted? A restart won't fix it).

We can use WAL for FSM.

Vadim

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-05-21 16:58:45 Re: Detecting readline in configure
Previous Message Mikheev, Vadim 2001-05-21 16:53:35 RE: Plans for solving the VACUUM problem