Re: Are large objects well supported? Are they considered very stableto use?

From: Chris Bitmead <chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com>
To:
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: Are large objects well supported? Are they considered very stableto use?
Date: 1999-03-30 14:07:52
Message-ID: 3700DAB8.70745953@bigfoot.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


Thanks for all the suggestions about large objects. To me they sound
nearly a waste of time, partly because they take 2 unix files for each
one, and partly because the minimum size is 16k.

For the moment I think I will use text type in a regular class and just
put up with the restriction of less than 8k. Maybe I will use an "oid
more," link for chaining.

I think the only real solution to this is to remove the arbitrary limits
in postgres as in the 8k record limit and the 8k query buffer limit.

Has anybody thought much about this yet?

--
Chris Bitmead
http://www.bigfoot.com/~chris.bitmead
mailto:chris(dot)bitmead(at)bigfoot(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David O'Farrell 1999-03-30 14:16:11 Announcing 6.5 Beta!
Previous Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-03-30 13:58:32 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Are large objects well supported? Are they considered very stableto use?