Re: Optimization rules for semi and anti joins

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Optimization rules for semi and anti joins
Date: 2009-02-11 14:36:38
Message-ID: 36e682920902110636n5e54d0m7701653f8f33a5ba@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:05 AM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:

> As has been discussed here many, many times, the only kind of person
> who should be doing a patent search is a company's IP attorney, which
> you are not, and even if you were, under no circumstances would such a
> person paste that link in a public forum.

First of all, it was not an intentional patent search. Secondly, I don't
believe there's any restriction of explicitly what can and cannot be posted
on a public Postgres mailing list.

> Should we have a kick-off policy for this kind of misbehavior?

Shut up David.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA
myYearbook.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message D'Arcy J.M. Cain 2009-02-11 14:49:21 Re: A deprecation policy
Previous Message Andrew Chernow 2009-02-11 14:15:02 Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf