Re: Optimization rules for semi and anti joins

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Optimization rules for semi and anti joins
Date: 2009-02-11 01:09:03
Message-ID: 36e682920902101709n392e081fw57662a084ad87b0f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> I wrote (in response to Kevin Grittner's recent issues):
> > Reflecting on this further, I suspect there are also some bugs in the
> > planner's rules about when semi/antijoins can commute with other joins;
>
> After doing some math I've concluded this is in fact the case. Anyone
> want to check my work?

FWIW, the logic looks correct to me.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA
myYearbook.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jonah H. Harris 2009-02-11 01:12:56 Re: Optimization rules for semi and anti joins
Previous Message Andrew Chernow 2009-02-11 00:49:00 Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf