Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: justin(at)emproshunts(dot)com, "Brian Hurt" <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
Date: 2008-12-15 21:56:08
Message-ID: 36e682920812151356w66b8a1e8i958d844b3adae78f@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 3:26 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
> You can't compare DBT2 with TPCC. They're not the same benchmark.

Agreed. Somewhere earlier in the thread I mentioned that the OSDL
kits are non-spec-compliant, a little buggy, and sometimes give better
results than the real tests.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Senior DBA
myYearbook.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2008-12-15 23:24:34 Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2008-12-15 21:51:29 Re: Postgres vr.s Oracle