Re: PANIC caused by open_sync on Linux

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PANIC caused by open_sync on Linux
Date: 2007-10-26 13:01:14
Message-ID: 36e682920710260601m33d1db74n1aa495d8238b2c9d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 10/26/07, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> This ties into a loose end we didn't get to yet: being more aggressive
> about creating future WAL segments. ISTM there is no good reason for
> clients ever to have to wait for WAL segment creation --- the bgwriter,
> or possibly the walwriter, ought to handle that in the background.

Agreed.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah(dot)harris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-10-26 13:09:42 Re: PostgreSQL 8.3, libpq and WHERE CURRENT OF
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-10-26 12:59:47 Re: Autovacuum cancellation