| From: | "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "PostgreSQL advocacy" <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres" |
| Date: | 2007-10-25 15:41:26 |
| Message-ID: | 36e682920710250841m63af86c6vfb6949ea49c14097@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-docs |
On 10/25/07, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> So, for the FAQ, which currently uses the second-entry-per-paragraph
> logic, should it be changed to the logic suggested above where every
> mention but the first is "Postgres"? (This will of course affect the
> documentation changes when we are ready to discuss those.)
+1
Seems like the next logical step for the alias.
--
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah(dot)harris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2007-10-25 16:10:02 | Re: Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres" |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-10-25 15:32:29 | Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres" |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2007-10-25 16:10:02 | Re: Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres" |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-10-25 15:32:29 | Pattern for use of the alias "Postgres" |