Re: Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL feature comparison - Part 2

From: "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jeff Davis" <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: "Derek Rodner" <derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL feature comparison - Part 2
Date: 2007-10-11 19:26:51
Message-ID: 36e682920710111226y24ea7f51id827f483a0a2e51d@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

On 10/11/07, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> wrote:
> I would like postgres to have a really good auditing system. For me,
> it's one of the most important features that postgresql doesn't already
> have.

Agreed.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301
499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | jonah(dot)harris(at)enterprisedb(dot)com
Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2007-10-11 19:32:35 Re: Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL feature comparison - Part 2
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2007-10-11 19:25:47 Re: Oracle, MySQL, and PostgreSQL feature comparison - Part 2